↓ Skip to main content

Antituberculosis drug resistance patterns in adults with tuberculous meningitis: results of haydarpasa-iv study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antituberculosis drug resistance patterns in adults with tuberculous meningitis: results of haydarpasa-iv study
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12941-015-0107-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seniha Senbayrak, Nuri Ozkutuk, Hakan Erdem, Isik Somuncu Johansen, Rok Civljak, Ayse Seza Inal, Uner Kayabas, Ebru Kursun, Nazif Elaldi, Branislava Savic, Soline Simeon, Emel Yilmaz, Olga Dulovic, Derya Ozturk-Engin, Nurgul Ceran, Botond Lakatos, Oguz Resat Sipahi, Mustafa Sunbul, Mucahit Yemisen, Selma Alabay, Bojana Beovic, Aysegul Ulu-Kilic, Yasemin Cag, Melanie Catroux, Asuman Inan, Gorana Dragovac, Ozcan Deveci, Recep Tekin, Hanefi Cem Gul, Gonul Sengoz, Katell Andre, Arjan Harxhi, Yves Hansmann, Serkan Oncu, Sukran Kose, Oral Oncul, Emine Parlak, Alper Sener, Gulden Yilmaz, Umit Savasci, Haluk Vahaboglu

Abstract

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to antituberculosis drugs is an increasingly common clinical problem. This study aimed to evaluate drug resistance profiles of TBM isolates in adult patients in nine European countries involving 32 centers to provide insight into the empiric treatment of TBM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was cultured from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 142 patients and was tested for susceptibility to first-line antituberculosis drugs, streptomycin (SM), isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB). Twenty of 142 isolates (14.1 %) were resistant to at least one antituberculosis drug, and five (3.5 %) were resistant to at least INH and RIF, [multidrug resistant (MDR)]. The resistance rate was 12, 4.9, 4.2 and 3.5 % for INH, SM, EMB and RIF, respectively. The monoresistance rate was 6.3, 1.4 and 0.7 % for INH, SM and EMB respectively. There was no monoresistance to RIF. The mortality rate was 23.8 % in fully susceptible cases while it was 33.3 % for those exhibiting monoresistance to INH, and 40 % in cases with MDR-TBM. In compared to patients without resistance to any first-line drug, the relative risk of death for INH-monoresistance and MDR-TBM was 1.60 (95 % CI, 0.38-6.82) and 2.14 (95 % CI, 0:34-13:42), respectively. INH-resistance and MDR rates seemed not to be worrisome in our study. However, considering their adverse effects on treatment, rapid detection of resistance to at least INH and RIF would be most beneficial for designing anti-TB therapy. Still, empiric TBM treatment should be started immediately without waiting the drug susceptibility testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,776,579
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#396
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,038
of 285,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.