| Title |
Integrating complementary methods to improve diet analysis in fishery‐targeted species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ece3.4456 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan K. Matley, Gregory E. Maes, Floriaan Devloo‐Delva, Roger Huerlimann, Gladys Chua, Andrew J. Tobin, Aaron T. Fisk, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Michelle R. Heupel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 21% |
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 56% |
| Scientists | 32 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#943,038
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#421
of 8,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,852
of 345,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.