↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of Exercise Prescription Guidelines Across One 4-Year Kinesiology Curriculum

Overview of attention for article published in Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge of Exercise Prescription Guidelines Across One 4-Year Kinesiology Curriculum
Published in
Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, November 2015
DOI 10.1080/02701367.2015.1083524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Megan J. Albee, Zachary Zenko

Abstract

Knowledge of evidence-based exercise prescription guidelines is considered a cornerstone of responsible professional practice. While many academics insist that a university degree in kinesiology or a related field should be required for all exercise professionals, the learning of exercise prescription guidelines that takes place during the course of a university degree program has not been investigated. An 11-question knowledge quiz about the frequency, duration, and intensity of cardiovascular exercise recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine (Garber et al., 2011) was administered to 683 undergraduate students majoring in kinesiology and 89 certified exercise professionals. Knowledge scores improved significantly, F(4, 764) = 16.69, p < .001, η(2) = .08, from the freshmen, who scored 24.30%, to the seniors, who scored 36.25%. Seniors did not differ significantly from the professionals, who scored 40.65%, despite the fact that 58.14% of professionals had graduate degrees and 44.95% had multiple certifications. However, 82.77% of seniors perceived that their knowledge of the guidelines (rated 5.48 out of 10) was lower than that required "to be able to function as an exercise professional safely and effectively" (rated 8.17). These data suggest that although significant learning of the guidelines occurs in a typical kinesiology curriculum, there is considerable room for improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,713,861
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport
#353
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,853
of 296,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.