↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of the consultation-based reassurance questionnaire in Danish chiropractic practice

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of the consultation-based reassurance questionnaire in Danish chiropractic practice
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12998-018-0197-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Kongsted, Magnus Rudbæk Christensen, Karl Kristian Ingersen, Tue Secher Jensen

Abstract

Reassuring information is recommended in clinical guidelines for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), but has not been clearly defined. The Consultation-based Reassurance Questionnaire (CRQ) was developed as a tool for measuring to what extent reassurance is present in back pain consultations and may provide important information about the clinical encounter. Until now the CRQ has only been tested in general practice patients in the UK although many patients with LBP are seen outside of this setting. The objectives of this study were to translate the CRQ into Danish, test its feasibility in chiropractic practice, and determine if CRQ scores were associated with satisfaction with care and perceived pain control. On the day of the first visit for a LBP episode, patients received an electronic survey including the CRQ. Distributions and completeness of responses on the four subscales of the CRQ (data-gathering, relationship-building, generic reassurance, cognitive reassurance) were assessed, and internal consistency for each subscale calculated as Cronbach's alpha. Outcomes at 2 weeks were; satisfaction with care (5-point Likert scale dichotomised into yes/no) and ability to control pain (0-10). Associations of the CRQ with patient characteristics and outcomes were determined in mixed models to account for dependency of observations within clinics. From 964 patients visiting between November 2016 and October 2017 with new episodes of LBP, 717 completed the CRQ with no more than 1% missing values on any single item. The internal consistency was acceptable for all subscales (0.67-0.86). Scores were generally high, and more so in patients visiting a chiropractor for the first time. All four subscales were positively associated with satisfaction (Odds ratios 1.08-1.23) and generic reassurance was weakly associated with pain control (β = 0.07 [95% CI 0.03-0.11]). The CRQ was feasible for use in a Danish chiropractic setting and scores on all four reassurance subscales related positively to patients' satisfaction. Patients who had visited a chiropractor previously reported slightly lower levels of reassuring information, and it should be explored if this is in accordance with the patients' needs. The potential impact on patient outcomes needs investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 22 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,959,479
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#120
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,732
of 347,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them