↓ Skip to main content

Contact pathway of coagulation and inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contact pathway of coagulation and inflammation
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12959-015-0048-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Wu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Other 12 10%
Other 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Unspecified 15 13%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 22 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,005,590
of 13,444,601 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#60
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,019
of 266,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,601 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them