↓ Skip to main content

Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century
Published in
Conservation Letters, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12211
Authors

Daniel Decker, Christian Smith, Ann Forstchen, Darragh Hare, Emily Pomeranz, Catherine Doyle-Capitman, Krysten Schuler, John Organ

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 29%
Environmental Science 53 28%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 38 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,335,271
of 20,323,171 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#481
of 946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,531
of 299,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,323,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.