↓ Skip to main content

Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century
Published in
Conservation Letters, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12211
Authors

Daniel Decker, Christian Smith, Ann Forstchen, Darragh Hare, Emily Pomeranz, Catherine Doyle-Capitman, Krysten Schuler, John Organ

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 180 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 29%
Environmental Science 53 28%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,441,740
of 21,337,804 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#496
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,423
of 302,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,337,804 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.