↓ Skip to main content

Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century
Published in
Conservation Letters, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12211
Authors

Daniel Decker, Christian Smith, Ann Forstchen, Darragh Hare, Emily Pomeranz, Catherine Doyle-Capitman, Krysten Schuler, John Organ

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 85 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 15 16%
Unspecified 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 35%
Environmental Science 32 35%
Unspecified 12 13%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#684,293
of 12,465,758 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#294
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,107
of 274,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,465,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.