↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 10,253)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
531 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
RETRACTED: The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World
Published in
Current Biology, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Decety, Jason M. Cowell, Kang Lee, Randa Mahasneh, Susan Malcolm-Smith, Bilge Selcuk, Xinyue Zhou

Abstract

Prosocial behaviors are ubiquitous across societies. They emerge early in ontogeny [1] and are shaped by interactions between genes and culture [2, 3]. Over the course of middle childhood, sharing approaches equality in distribution [4]. Since 5.8 billion humans, representing 84% of the worldwide population, identify as religious [5], religion is arguably one prevalent facet of culture that influences the development and expression of prosociality. While it is generally accepted that religion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation between religiosity and morality is a contentious one. Here, we assessed altruism and third-party evaluation of scenarios depicting interpersonal harm in 1,170 children aged between 5 and 12 years in six countries (Canada, China, Jordan, Turkey, USA, and South Africa), the religiousness of their household, and parent-reported child empathy and sensitivity to justice. Across all countries, parents in religious households reported that their children expressed more empathy and sensitivity for justice in everyday life than non-religious parents. However, religiousness was inversely predictive of children's altruism and positively correlated with their punitive tendencies. Together these results reveal the similarity across countries in how religion negatively influences children's altruism, challenging the view that religiosity facilitates prosocial behavior.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,502 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 2%
Germany 11 2%
United States 7 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 476 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 24%
Researcher 106 20%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Student > Master 57 11%
Professor 30 6%
Other 125 24%
Unknown 31 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 166 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 19%
Social Sciences 39 7%
Neuroscience 22 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 4%
Other 124 23%
Unknown 57 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#731
of 14,008,920 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#9
of 10,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 284,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#1
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,008,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.