↓ Skip to main content

The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 9,248)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
22 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1370 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
28 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
54 Google+ users
reddit
12 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
504 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World
Published in
Current Biology, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Decety, Jason M. Cowell, Kang Lee, Randa Mahasneh, Susan Malcolm-Smith, Bilge Selcuk, Xinyue Zhou

Abstract

Prosocial behaviors are ubiquitous across societies. They emerge early in ontogeny [1] and are shaped by interactions between genes and culture [2, 3]. Over the course of middle childhood, sharing approaches equality in distribution [4]. Since 5.8 billion humans, representing 84% of the worldwide population, identify as religious [5], religion is arguably one prevalent facet of culture that influences the development and expression of prosociality. While it is generally accepted that religion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation between religiosity and morality is a contentious one. Here, we assessed altruism and third-party evaluation of scenarios depicting interpersonal harm in 1,170 children aged between 5 and 12 years in six countries (Canada, China, Jordan, Turkey, USA, and South Africa), the religiousness of their household, and parent-reported child empathy and sensitivity to justice. Across all countries, parents in religious households reported that their children expressed more empathy and sensitivity for justice in everyday life than non-religious parents. However, religiousness was inversely predictive of children's altruism and positively correlated with their punitive tendencies. Together these results reveal the similarity across countries in how religion negatively influences children's altruism, challenging the view that religiosity facilitates prosocial behavior.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,370 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 3%
Germany 10 2%
United States 7 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 449 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 24%
Researcher 101 20%
Student > Master 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Professor 34 7%
Other 139 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 149 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 20%
Unspecified 44 9%
Social Sciences 41 8%
Neuroscience 23 5%
Other 146 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1990. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#606
of 12,307,885 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#8
of 9,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 263,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#1
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,307,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.