↓ Skip to main content

Financial interventions and movement restrictions for managing the movement of health workers between public and private organizations in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Financial interventions and movement restrictions for managing the movement of health workers between public and private organizations in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009845.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Alison A Kinengyere, Freddie Ssengooba, George W Pariyo, Suzanne N Kiwanuka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 28%
Researcher 18 15%
Unspecified 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Librarian 9 8%
Other 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 36%
Unspecified 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Other 13 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,743,759
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,222
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,089
of 275,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.