↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients of a Ghanaian psychiatry hospital

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients of a Ghanaian psychiatry hospital
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1634-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwabena O. Duedu, Yaw A. Karikari, Simon K. Attah, Patrick F. Ayeh-Kumi

Abstract

Neglected tropical diseases are of major concern to sub-Saharan African countries. Though efforts to monitor the prevalence and control are in place, these are mostly restricted to groups within the population. This study was performed to determine the prevalence among patients of a Ghanaian psychiatric hospital and find out whether there is a reason for active monitoring in this population. A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of intestinal parasites among patients of a Ghanaian psychiatric hospital. Stool samples were collected and analyzed in addition to data. Of the 111 patients studied, asymptomatic carriage of parasites was 13.5 % and was higher in males (18.8 %) than in females (4.8 %). Carriage of parasites decreased with age but increase with duration of admission. This is the first report of parasitic pathogens among patients of a psychiatric institution in Ghana. The data shows that there are risks of transmission of infectious diseases via the oral route hence, the need for regular monitoring and intervention is emphasized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 34 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,015
of 4,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,286
of 285,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#126
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.