@stevesi @zeynep @qhardy @benedictevans You mean like this MRI? It might be a tad late to get your social security payments once we figure out in fifteen years time that we really did not understand what we were doing, as we didn't know where to look for p
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/U8twuIsXO7
@jurgenvinju Related to that bubble, this story: https://t.co/KynB69n1xP Don't know what happened afterwards. Was this study on false-positive a false-positive in itself? Did it change anything? We did not become more suspicious of stats software since it
@social_brains ... If it is done right. https://t.co/HmRwe7afZB
RT @NeilSJefferies: Software preservation is all very well but how about preserving a specification and test set so we can tell when it is…
Software preservation is all very well but how about preserving a specification and test set so we can tell when it is working? Reproducibility needs to target software too. Remember this: https://t.co/9vJBdO3pBQ
Doing research without knowing how to do... As said Altman in 1994, it's a "scandal"... https://t.co/rQP3lotyIg
Examples for neuroimaging 3: - Will we move away from using p<0.01 as cluster forming threshold and using more non-parametric tests after the clusterf$%@ debacle? 8/n @ten_photos @wandedob https://t.co/rIDS7f0kV0
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/kbUSVp2FLv
RT @DocDellaire: @rob_beiko Validation of mechanisms by which metabolites/RNAs, immune responses etc induced by microbiota actually explain…
@rob_beiko Validation of mechanisms by which metabolites/RNAs, immune responses etc induced by microbiota actually explain correlations with phenotypes. This is an area that needs much attention to avoid a similar fate to the "woo" around Functional MRI
I located the key paper on the fMRI analysis problem, I think. It’s an interesting story. I’d be interested in what people see as the ‘moral’ of the story, if there is one. I _think_ it mostly has to do with the power of data sharing. https://t.co/K7Lj5N
@joarguterstam Även om man struntar i könsskillnader och bara ser till metoden: https://t.co/24CS0jRG0D https://t.co/mpAdzIqmoN
@zreagh Sure, but you have plenty of other things to worry about wrt methods and interpretation (e.g., https://t.co/Xea3bZbxos)
@deevybee Using a broad-brush definition of “psychologists”, does this count? https://t.co/N1gB8QWgvv (Disclaimer: I know no detail and believe it turned out less bad than thought.)
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/AqyODfjXNR #datascience #analytics
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
Good Lord! Now I know what @page88 was talking about in Magic & Loss. https://t.co/tLlXA6NT6t
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
RT @DataSciFact: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/62fMC8mgof
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/Q5xmErekwE via @nuzzel
And now for something completely different. Cluster correction by @wandedob and @ten_photos CK: thinks that the point of the paper is to NOT use cluster correction, while the paper is saying to USE permutation based cluster correction as we did. https://t.
Questionable statistical methods in fMRI investigations? https://t.co/AClTnMLSOF
😱 up to 70% of false positives during years https://t.co/kGl4NzgIcj https://t.co/Axo87aNsnN
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
Thanks for the tip, I wrote the paper https://t.co/5zjBTf669B
@wandedob Stil interested? For me it is definitelly this one: https://t.co/5PyEiSP4pf #tldr Cluster fMRI studies have false positivity around 70%.
@Mark_A_Thornton I think the cluster failure paper showed some corroborating evidence: https://t.co/5Qx3Ob53Yh
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/at87pV57FK
@tbrissaire De plus la significativité des résultats d'IRMf est remise en cause par les chercheurs eux mêmes https://t.co/DqkRCh0SUO
@SeverianX No, no es un campo muy serio. Tienen graves fallas metodológicas principalmente https://t.co/OUNsTg1wbQ , https://t.co/oW844vc9OU, etc.
@practiCalfMRI @ETagliazucchi @Labrigger Also, it sounds like false positives to me due to poor multiple comparison control. See @wandedob et @ten_photos 's https://t.co/eb7zQERjEu
@Werner See also https://t.co/5orSqrOu7H turns out statistical miss understandings has led to faulty interpretation of the raw data
Why fMRI Inferences for Spatial Extent Have Inflated False-Positive Rates https://t.co/6GTMjjsT5S
Why fMRI Inferences for Spatial Extent Have Inflated False-Positive Rates https://t.co/lm9rVv7WUb
@DaveclarkR I'm still flabbergasted at the MRI baseline issues https://t.co/8HdYZ0gReQ
The most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70% https://t.co/4FyzsPEagB
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/oj7eAzlAP0
@chrisoldfield be careful. BOLD MRI is full of errors. https://t.co/Jbei9q6sj7
RT @BlakeLaPierre: @akornblatt, I haven't said anything about peer review, but I disagree that it can be trusted. Peers kept approving: htt…
@akornblatt, I haven't said anything about peer review, but I disagree that it can be trusted. Peers kept approving: https://t.co/mTtEOL4lid https://t.co/FMatRFNm6z
@mnitabach @wandedob did something along those lines with his Cluster failure paper, but not exactly what you are proposing https://t.co/6vmM4WhyT5
RT @INCForg: .@wandedob: the analyses in our PNAS paper took 25 days with BROCCOLI. Would take decades with FSL https://t.co/XqlIRewNQJ #bh…
.@wandedob: the analyses in our PNAS paper took 25 days with BROCCOLI. Would take decades with FSL https://t.co/XqlIRewNQJ #bhg17
#neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rates of up to 70% ins…
RT @carlesmuntaner: Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
RT @carlesmuntaner: Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
RT @camerontw: @nicolasnova fMRI - the fake news source for all your favorite biodeterministic research https://t.co/ahPuHwZs6n
And also our (mis)understanding of statistics! https://t.co/gIwp857TgH https://t.co/RGN1WgDreF
Acabo de descobrir que Ressonância Magnética Funcional (fMRI) tem uma taxa de falso-positivo de até 70% (!!!) https://t.co/Q9lQHln8tY
Um exemplo disso é o artigo de Eklund (2016) https://t.co/xZCTQjrnRa
Ai!, la "Ciència" (i, en especial, la neuroimatge)! Que tantíssim agrada a molts, argument definitiu tantes vegades! https://t.co/JqcVe2lq76
@LebensTourist @sixtus Derartige Studien die unter anderem auf MRI Scans beruhen sind mit Vorsicht zu genießen. https://t.co/CI9MiU3jrL
Meraklısına fMRI daki yazılım bug u hakkında. https://t.co/JFJfQSG2M3 https://t.co/6BUNJV9Fu6 https://t.co/iD31uQiH2v
RT @Parsons_CNS: Software bug causes concerns about findings from years of fMRI-based brain research: https://t.co/kac0ZcGIiR
RT @Parsons_CNS: Software bug causes concerns about findings from years of fMRI-based brain research: https://t.co/kac0ZcGIiR
RT @lofalexandria: #neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rate…
RT @Parsons_CNS: Software bug causes concerns about findings from years of fMRI-based brain research: https://t.co/kac0ZcGIiR
RT @Parsons_CNS: Software bug causes concerns about findings from years of fMRI-based brain research: https://t.co/kac0ZcGIiR
Software bug causes concerns about findings from years of fMRI-based brain research: https://t.co/kac0ZcGIiR
@AgnesWold @bodin_anna Låter som en av de där felaktiga fMRI-studierna. Se https://t.co/mUkMNv1QY7 – fMRI ska tas med en stor nypa salt.
@AgnesWold kan inte kommentera just det pappret, men 40% av 241 fMRI papper justerar inte för multiple testing. https://t.co/5wrTgfj7Yy
@AgnesWold @EiramRu @bodin_anna @NCBI Dra inte för stora växlar: studie med få deltagare + tveksam korrektion för falskt positiva fynd, jmf https://t.co/DYDZ9dYokK av @wandedob
#neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rates of up to 70% ins…
https://t.co/PJgZ9se6CZ Ibland älskar jag Linköping.
@Brain_Craft Hi Braincraft! Just read this paper: https://t.co/fk36TJ6hZT. How do you think it may affect neuroscience?
https://t.co/BJCWBYYJni - Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates Functional MRI (fMRI…
PNAS | Mobile https://t.co/jdbGnyci6q
https://t.co/0Lgys0toeU 40,000 published studies using MRI may be wrong: software flaw That's why we make our own tools @RioNeuro #craftsmen
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates | PNAS https://t.co/sRj38fETBa
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates | PNAS https://t.co/w7N5u2yNNj
@DucMantua Per si no ho sabies: https://t.co/ZiY9n2S3iW
RT @Roran_Stehl: @stillgray @sie_kensou77 @motherboard @erikkain https://t.co/wT07s53VsH and we're done.
@stillgray @sie_kensou77 @motherboard @erikkain https://t.co/wT07s53VsH and we're done.
@csabaorban @schoppik related research on (crazy) high false positive rates for fMRI: https://t.co/beu5yavC9x
RT @LEAD_Coalition: Why #fmri inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/dsSoxXDDMV and https://t.co/RtY…
Pour tout ceux qui utlisent de l'IRMf #fmri #cluster https://t.co/C1lLxftWFc
Oops! Inaccurate fMRI Data. Some 40,000 studies' results may be affected. https://t.co/eSh0NwL8bw #DataForensics #OpenData #OpenScience
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/36HPeVsU3v
Why #fmri inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/dsSoxXDDMV and… https://t.co/zzdWQhR6Qa
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet… https://t.co/PsgTbyByw2
@nntaleb how do psychologists and pop-scientists sleep when fMRIs have been known for false positive rates of 70%. https://t.co/PopzHAQ1Vf
Media loves a brain study, but as Nat'l Academies points out, brain imaging may not be accurate or reliable. https://t.co/Mr0Jl0tNA1 https://t.co/unK6TZCsLg