↓ Skip to main content

The role of vitamin D in ovarian cancer: epidemiology, molecular mechanism and prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ovarian Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 717)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of vitamin D in ovarian cancer: epidemiology, molecular mechanism and prevention
Published in
Journal of Ovarian Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13048-018-0443-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Guo, Jing Guo, Wenli Xie, Lingqin Yuan, Xiugui Sheng

Abstract

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble prohormone best known for its role in maintaining calcium homeostasis. Large numbers of epidemiological studies have shown that vitamin D plays an important role in cancer prevention by regulating cellular proliferation and metabolism. Studies of the cellular mechanism of vitamin D in ovarian cancer strongly suggest that it exhibits protective and antitumorigenic activities through genomic and nongenomic signal transduction pathways. These results indicate that vitamin D deficiency results in an increase in the risk of developing ovarian cancer and that vitamin supplements may potentially be an efficient way of preventing cancer. Consequently, this review describes the epidemiology, molecular mechanism and evidence linking vitamin D deficiency to ovarian cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 37 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 40 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,156,457
of 25,235,400 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#11
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,208
of 341,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.