↓ Skip to main content

Leadership in Mammalian Societies: Emergence, Distribution, Power, and Payoff

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
9 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leadership in Mammalian Societies: Emergence, Distribution, Power, and Payoff
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer E. Smith, Sergey Gavrilets, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Paul L. Hooper, Claire El Mouden, Daniel Nettle, Christoph Hauert, Kim Hill, Susan Perry, Anne E. Pusey, Mark van Vugt, Eric Alden Smith

Abstract

Leadership is an active area of research in both the biological and social sciences. This review provides a transdisciplinary synthesis of biological and social-science views of leadership from an evolutionary perspective, and examines patterns of leadership in a set of small-scale human and non-human mammalian societies. We review empirical and theoretical work on leadership in four domains: movement, food acquisition, within-group conflict mediation, and between-group interactions. We categorize patterns of variation in leadership in five dimensions: distribution (across individuals), emergence (achieved versus inherited), power, relative payoff to leadership, and generality (across domains). We find that human leadership exhibits commonalities with and differences from the broader mammalian pattern, raising interesting theoretical and empirical issues.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 279 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 25%
Student > Master 47 16%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 39 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 34%
Psychology 32 11%
Social Sciences 27 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 7%
Environmental Science 14 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 51 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#231,696
of 21,767,865 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#112
of 2,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,062
of 303,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,767,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.