↓ Skip to main content

Kawasaki disease: guidelines of Italian Society of Pediatrics, part II - treatment of resistant forms and cardiovascular complications, follow-up, lifestyle and prevention of cardiovascular risks

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kawasaki disease: guidelines of Italian Society of Pediatrics, part II - treatment of resistant forms and cardiovascular complications, follow-up, lifestyle and prevention of cardiovascular risks
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13052-018-0529-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Marchesi, Isabella Tarissi de Jacobis, Donato Rigante, Alessandro Rimini, Walter Malorni, Giovanni Corsello, Grazia Bossi, Sabrina Buonuomo, Fabio Cardinale, Elisabetta Cortis, Fabrizio De Benedetti, Andrea De Zorzi, Marzia Duse, Domenico Del Principe, Rosa Maria Dellepiane, Livio D’Isanto, Maya El Hachem, Susanna Esposito, Fernanda Falcini, Ugo Giordano, Maria Cristina Maggio, Savina Mannarino, Gianluigi Marseglia, Silvana Martino, Giulia Marucci, Rossella Massaro, Christian Pescosolido, Donatella Pietraforte, Maria Cristina Pietrogrande, Patrizia Salice, Aurelio Secinaro, Elisabetta Straface, Alberto Villani

Abstract

This second part of practical Guidelines related to Kawasaki disease (KD) has the goal of contributing to prompt diagnosis and most appropriate treatment of KD resistant forms and cardiovascular complications, including non-pharmacologic treatments, follow-up, lifestyle and prevention of cardiovascular risks in the long-term through a set of 17 recommendations.Guidelines, however, should not be considered a norm that limits the treatment options of pediatricians and practitioners, as treatment modalities other than those recommended may be required as a result of peculiar medical circumstances, patient's condition, and disease severity or individual complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,292,663
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#389
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,571
of 344,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.