↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in medicine use in Central Eastern Europe: an empirical investigation of socioeconomic determinants in eight countries

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequalities in medicine use in Central Eastern Europe: an empirical investigation of socioeconomic determinants in eight countries
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0261-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Vogler, August Österle, Susanne Mayer

Abstract

Equitable access to essential medicines is a major challenge for policy-makers world-wide, including Central and Eastern European countries. Member States of the European Union situated in Central and Eastern Europe have publicly funded pharmaceutical reimbursement systems that should promote accessibility and affordability of, at least essential medicines. However, there is no knowledge whether socioeconomic inequalities exist in these countries. Against this backdrop, this study analyses whether socioeconomic determinants influence the use of prescribed and non-prescribed medicines in eight Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia). Further, the study discusses observed (in)equalities in medicine use in the context of the pharmaceutical policy framework and the implementation in these countries. The study is based on cross-sectional data from the first wave of the European Health Interview Survey (2007-2009). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine the association between socioeconomic status (measured by employment status, education, income; controlled for age, gender, health status) and medicine use (prescribed and non-prescribed medicines). This was supplemented by a pharmaceutical policy analysis based on indicators in four policy dimensions (sustainable funding, affordability, availability and accessibility, and rational selection and use of medicines). Overall, the analysis showed a gradient favouring individuals from higher socioeconomic groups in the consumption of non-prescribed medicines in the eight surveyed countries, and for prescribed medicines in three countries (Latvia, Poland, Romania). The pharmaceutical systems in the eight countries were, to varying degrees, characterized by a lack of (public) funding, thus resulting in high and growing shares of private financing (including co-payments for prescribed medicines), inefficiencies in the selection of medicines into reimbursement and limitations in medicines availability. Pharmaceutical policies aiming at reducing inequalities in medicine use require not only a consideration of the role of co-payments and other private expenditure but also adequate investment in medicines and transparent and clear processes regarding the inclusion of medicines into reimbursement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 25 27%