You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemostat culture systems support diverse bacteriophage communities from human feces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-015-0124-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tasha M. Santiago-Rodriguez, Melissa Ly, Michelle C. Daigneault, Ian H. L. Brown, Julie A. K. McDonald, Natasha Bonilla, Emma Allen Vercoe, David T. Pride |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,183,894
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,342
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,613
of 299,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.