↓ Skip to main content

Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
15 X users
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
822 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
945 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces
Published in
Nature Materials, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/nmat4463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyunwoo Yuk, Teng Zhang, Shaoting Lin, German Alberto Parada, Xuanhe Zhao

Abstract

In many animals, the bonding of tendon and cartilage to bone is extremely tough (for example, interfacial toughness ∼800 J m(-2); refs ,), yet such tough interfaces have not been achieved between synthetic hydrogels and non-porous surfaces of engineered solids. Here, we report a strategy to design tough transparent and conductive bonding of synthetic hydrogels containing 90% water to non-porous surfaces of diverse solids, including glass, silicon, ceramics, titanium and aluminium. The design strategy is to anchor the long-chain polymer networks of tough hydrogels covalently to non-porous solid surfaces, which can be achieved by the silanation of such surfaces. Compared with physical interactions, the chemical anchorage results in a higher intrinsic work of adhesion and in significant energy dissipation of bulk hydrogel during detachment, which lead to interfacial toughness values over 1,000 J m(-2). We also demonstrate applications of robust hydrogel-solid hybrids, including hydrogel superglues, mechanically protective hydrogel coatings, hydrogel joints for robotic structures and robust hydrogel-metal conductors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 945 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 926 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 254 27%
Student > Master 125 13%
Researcher 106 11%
Student > Bachelor 77 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 7%
Other 100 11%
Unknown 219 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 223 24%
Materials Science 164 17%
Chemistry 126 13%
Chemical Engineering 38 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 3%
Other 106 11%
Unknown 255 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#243,657
of 24,279,062 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#151
of 4,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,421
of 289,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,279,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.