You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New gene functions in megakaryopoiesis and platelet formation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10659 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Gieger, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Ana Cvejic, Weihong Tang, Eleonora Porcu, Giorgio Pistis, Jovana Serbanovic-Canic, Ulrich Elling, Alison H. Goodall, Yann Labrune, Lorna M. Lopez, Reedik Mägi, Stuart Meacham, Yukinori Okada, Nicola Pirastu, Rossella Sorice, Alexander Teumer, Katrin Voss, Weihua Zhang, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis, Joshua C. Bis, David Ellinghaus, Martin Gögele, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Claudia Langenberg, Peter Kovacs, Paul F. O’Reilly, So-Youn Shin, Tõnu Esko, Jaana Hartiala, Stavroula Kanoni, Federico Murgia, Afshin Parsa, Jonathan Stephens, Pim van der Harst, C. Ellen van der Schoot, Hooman Allayee, Antony Attwood, Beverley Balkau, François Bastardot, Saonli Basu, Sebastian E. Baumeister, Ginevra Biino, Lorenzo Bomba, Amélie Bonnefond, François Cambien, John C. Chambers, Francesco Cucca, Pio D’Adamo, Gail Davies, Rudolf A. de Boer, Eco J. C. de Geus, Angela Döring, Paul Elliott, Jeanette Erdmann, David M. Evans, Mario Falchi, Wei Feng, Aaron R. Folsom, Ian H. Frazer, Quince D. Gibson, Nicole L. Glazer, Chris Hammond, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, Susan R. Heckbert, Christian Hengstenberg, Micha Hersch, Thomas Illig, Ruth J. F. Loos, Jennifer Jolley, Kay-Tee Khaw, Brigitte Kühnel, Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis, Vasiliki Lagou, Heather Lloyd-Jones, Thomas Lumley, Massimo Mangino, Andrea Maschio, Irene Mateo Leach, Barbara McKnight, Yasin Memari, Braxton D. Mitchell, Grant W. Montgomery, Yusuke Nakamura, Matthias Nauck, Gerjan Navis, Ute Nöthlings, Ilja M. Nolte, David J. Porteous, Anneli Pouta, Peter P. Pramstaller, Janne Pullat, Susan M. Ring, Jerome I. Rotter, Daniela Ruggiero, Aimo Ruokonen, Cinzia Sala, Nilesh J. Samani, Jennifer Sambrook, David Schlessinger, Stefan Schreiber, Heribert Schunkert, James Scott, Nicholas L. Smith, Harold Snieder, John M. Starr, Michael Stumvoll, Atsushi Takahashi, W. H. Wilson Tang, Kent Taylor, Albert Tenesa, Swee Lay Thein, Anke Tönjes, Manuela Uda, Sheila Ulivi, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Peter M. Visscher, Uwe Völker, H.-Erich Wichmann, Kerri L. Wiggins, Gonneke Willemsen, Tsun-Po Yang, Jing Hua Zhao, Paavo Zitting, John R. Bradley, George V. Dedoussis, Paolo Gasparini, Stanley L. Hazen, Andres Metspalu, Mario Pirastu, Alan R. Shuldiner, L. Joost van Pelt, Jaap-Jan Zwaginga, Dorret I. Boomsma, Ian J. Deary, Andre Franke, Philippe Froguel, Santhi K. Ganesh, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Nicholas G. Martin, Christa Meisinger, Bruce M. Psaty, Timothy D. Spector, Nicholas J. Wareham, Jan-Willem N. Akkerman, Marina Ciullo, Panos Deloukas, Andreas Greinacher, Steve Jupe, Naoyuki Kamatani, Jyoti Khadake, Jaspal S. Kooner, Josef Penninger, Inga Prokopenko, Derek Stemple, Daniela Toniolo, Lorenz Wernisch, Serena Sanna, Andrew A. Hicks, Augusto Rendon, Manuel A. Ferreira, Willem H. Ouwehand, Nicole Soranzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 417 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 130 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 17% |
| Professor | 38 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 87 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,882,727
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,014
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,473
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#489
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.