↓ Skip to main content

Family physicians’ intention to support women in making informed decisions about breast cancer screening with mammography: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family physicians’ intention to support women in making informed decisions about breast cancer screening with mammography: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1608-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence-Ndoh Kiyang, Michel Labrecque, Florence Doualla-Bell, Stéphane Turcotte, Céline Farley, Myrtha Cionti Bas, Johanne Blais, France Légaré

Abstract

The net benefits of routine breast cancer screening with mammography have been questioned, and there is evidence to indicate that supporting women to make an informed decision about breast cancer screening with mammography is preferable. The aims of this study were to assess the intention of family physicians to provide women with this support and the determinants of this intention, and to identify factors that might influence family physicians adopting this behavior. Family physicians from the province of Quebec, Canada, attending a 45-min lecture on informed decision making and cancer screening were asked to complete a questionnaire after the lecture regarding their intention to adopt the behavior. The questions, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, measured physicians' intention and its determinants (attitude, perceived behavioral control, and socio-professional norm) regarding supporting women to make informed decisions about breast cancer screening with mammography. Open-ended questions were also used to explore complementary factors influencing their intention. Out of 800 questionnaires distributed, 301 (38 %) were returned and 288 were included in data analysis. The mean ± standard deviation and median score for intention were respectively 1.9 ± 1.2 and 2.0 on a 6-point Likert scale (-3 to +3). Perceived behavioral control was the variable most strongly associated with intention (high versus low score, odds ratio = 15.7, 95 % CI 6.7-36.6), followed by attitude (high versus low score, odds ratio = 7.5, 95 % CI 3.3-16.8), then social norm (high versus low score, odds ratio = 5.8, 95 % CI 2.6-12.9). The most-reported barrier to adopting the behavior was time constraints (41 %) while the most-reported facilitator was availability of relevant decision support tools (29 %). Respondents showed strong intention to support women in informed decision-making about breast cancer screening, the strongest predictor being perceived behavioral control. These results could contribute to training physicians to integrate this behavior into their practices and to designing relevant decision support tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ghana 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,038,041
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,842
of 4,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,751
of 290,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#76
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.