You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the feasibility and synergistic value of the One Health approach in clinical research: protocol for a prospective observational study of diagnostic pathways in human and canine patients with suspected urinary tract infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-015-0036-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gloria Cordoba, Tina Møller Sørensen, Anne Holm, Charlotte Reinhard Bjørnvad, Lars Bjerrum, Lisbeth Rem Jessen |
| Abstract |
The One Health approach is emerging in response to the development of bacterial resistance. To the best of our knowledge, the possibility to use this approach in a clinical context has not yet been explored. Thus, in this paper, we report the procedures to implement a prospective observational study of diagnostic pathways in human and canine patients with suspected urinary tract infection as a means to assess the feasibility and synergistic value of setting up One Health clinical research projects and interventions. A prospective observational study will compare different diagnostic pathways (i.e., 16 possible combinations of diagnostic tools) to gold standard in human and veterinary primary care practice in Denmark. Fifty primary care practices and 100 veterinary clinics will each consecutively include 20 human patients or 8-10 dogs, respectively. Data will be collected at practice and patient level comprising (a) information about the organization of the practice and access to different diagnostic tools, (b) information about clinical history, diagnostic path and treatment during the index consultation, (c) information about severity of symptoms during the 7-10 days following inclusion, and (d) urine culture (type of microorganism and susceptibility test). The feasibility and synergistic value of conducting future research, and/or designing common interventions, will be assessed by evaluating the comparability of human primary care and veterinary primary care with respect to study implementation and study results. Results from this study will give an insight into the feasibility and synergistic value of setting-up One Health research projects in a clinical context. This is crucial if we are to embrace the One Health approach, as a legitimate strategy to implement common interventions aimed at influencing the diagnostic process in human and canine patients in order to decrease inappropriate use of antibiotics. The study in humans has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02249273. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#839
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,078
of 282,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.