↓ Skip to main content

Exercise-Based Knee and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,835)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
428 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise-Based Knee and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, September 2018
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2018.0303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia J.H. Arundale, Mario Bizzini, Airelle Giordano, Timothy E. Hewett, David S. Logerstedt, Bert Mandelbaum, David A. Scalzitti, Holly Silvers-Granelli, Lynn Snyder-Mackler

Abstract

The Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy and the American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy have an ongoing effort to create evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for orthopaedic and sports physical therapy management and prevention of musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). This particular guideline focuses on the exercise-based prevention of knee injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(9):A1-A42. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.0303.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 428 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 39 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 17%
Student > Master 34 15%
Other 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 72 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 26%
Unspecified 47 21%
Sports and Recreations 34 15%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 8 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#39,502
of 13,657,928 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#12
of 1,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,607
of 265,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,657,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.