↓ Skip to main content

Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-4-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine J Bowen, David Culliford, Ruth Allen, James Beacroft, Anita Gay, Lindsey Hooper, Jane Burridge, Christopher J Edwards, Nigel K Arden

Abstract

Plantar pressures are commonly used as clinical measures, especially to determine optimum foot orthotic design. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) high plantar foot pressures have been linked to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint radiological erosion scores. However, the sensitivity of foot pressure measurement to soft tissue pathology within the foot is unknown. The aim of this study was to observe plantar foot pressures and forefoot soft tissue pathology in patients who have RA.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Engineering 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
#9,954,252
of 12,434,464 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#451
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,440
of 216,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,434,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.