↓ Skip to main content

Population history provides foundational knowledge for utilizing and developing native plant restoration materials

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Applications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population history provides foundational knowledge for utilizing and developing native plant restoration materials
Published in
Evolutionary Applications, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/eva.12704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob Massatti, Holly R. Prendeville, Steve Larson, Bryce A. Richardson, Blair Waldron, Francis F. Kilkenny

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 37%
Environmental Science 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 1 2%
Unknown 14 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,836,194
of 17,911,762 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Applications
#752
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,379
of 284,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Applications
#30
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,911,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.