↓ Skip to main content

Population history provides foundational knowledge for utilizing and developing native plant restoration materials

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Applications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population history provides foundational knowledge for utilizing and developing native plant restoration materials
Published in
Evolutionary Applications, September 2018
DOI 10.1111/eva.12704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob Massatti, Holly R. Prendeville, Steve Larson, Bryce A. Richardson, Blair Waldron, Francis F. Kilkenny

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 38%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 50%
Unspecified 5 31%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,438,399
of 12,620,777 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Applications
#451
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,667
of 269,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Applications
#27
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,620,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.