↓ Skip to main content

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub2
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Pouchitis may occur following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis in approximately 30% of patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 114 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Other 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 39 31%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 14 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,616,144
of 13,219,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,387
of 10,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,267
of 205,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#372
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,219,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.