You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
False positive circumsporozoite protein ELISA: a challenge for the estimation of the entomological inoculation rate of malaria and for vector incrimination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lies Durnez, Wim Van Bortel, Leen Denis, Patricia Roelants, Aurélie Veracx, Ho Dinh Trung, Tho Sochantha, Marc Coosemans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,453
of 5,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,284
of 119,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.