↓ Skip to main content

Scoping review on vector-borne diseases in urban areas: transmission dynamics, vectorial capacity and co-infection

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases of Poverty, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scoping review on vector-borne diseases in urban areas: transmission dynamics, vectorial capacity and co-infection
Published in
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40249-018-0475-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Eder, Fanny Cortes, Noêmia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França, Stéphanie Degroote, Cynthia Braga, Valéry Ridde, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli

Abstract

Transmission dynamics, vectorial capacity, and co-infections have substantial impacts on vector-borne diseases (VBDs) affecting urban and suburban populations. Reviewing key factors can provide insight into priority research areas and offer suggestions for potential interventions. Through a scoping review, we identify knowledge gaps on transmission dynamics, vectorial capacity, and co-infections regarding VBDs in urban areas. Peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2016 was searched. We screened abstracts and full texts to select studies. Using an extraction grid, we retrieved general data, results, lessons learned and recommendations, future research avenues, and practice implications. We classified studies by VBD and country/continent and identified relevant knowledge gaps. Of 773 articles selected for full-text screening, 50 were included in the review: 23 based on research in the Americas, 15 in Asia, 10 in Africa, and one each in Europe and Australia. The largest body of evidence concerning VBD epidemiology in urban areas concerned dengue and malaria. Other arboviruses covered included chikungunya and West Nile virus, other parasitic diseases such as leishmaniasis and trypanosomiasis, and bacterial rickettsiosis and plague. Most articles retrieved in our review combined transmission dynamics and vectorial capacity; only two combined transmission dynamics and co-infection. The review identified significant knowledge gaps on the role of asymptomatic individuals, the effects of co-infection and other host factors, and the impacts of climatic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors on VBD transmission in urban areas. Limitations included the trade-off from narrowing the search strategy (missing out on classical modelling studies), a lack of studies on co-infections, most studies being only descriptive, and few offering concrete public health recommendations. More research is needed on transmission risk in homes and workplaces, given increasingly dynamic and mobile populations. The lack of studies on co-infection hampers monitoring of infections transmitted by the same vector. Strengthening VBD surveillance and control, particularly in asymptomatic cases and mobile populations, as well as using early warning tools to predict increasing transmission, were key strategies identified for public health policy and practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 14%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 103 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 78 24%
Unknown 113 35%