↓ Skip to main content

Learning how objects function via co-analysis of interactions

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning how objects function via co-analysis of interactions
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925870
Authors

Ruizhen Hu, Oliver van Kaick, Bojian Wu, Hui Huang, Ariel Shamir, Hao Zhang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Student > Master 13 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Researcher 4 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 33 60%
Engineering 4 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Design 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,382,069
of 16,822,220 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#750
of 2,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,916
of 279,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,822,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.