↓ Skip to main content

Pancytopenia in a patient with cystinosis secondary to myelosuppression from cystine crystal deposition: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pancytopenia in a patient with cystinosis secondary to myelosuppression from cystine crystal deposition: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0691-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yung Lyou, Xiaohui Zhao, Chaitali S. Nangia

Abstract

Cystinosis is a rare metabolic genetic disorder caused by a mutation in the cystinosin lysosomal cystine transporter gene. Clinically, it is characterized by systemic accumulation of cystine crystals in tissues causing end-organ dysfunction in the kidney, eyes, muscles, and other organs in the body. In very rare cases, it can also involve the bone marrow and the resulting cystine crystal deposition can cause myelosuppression leading to pancytopenia. Here we report the case of a 26-year-old white woman with cystinosis and other complex medical comorbidities who developed pancytopenia. She was worked up extensively and ruled out for common causes of pancytopenia (infectious disorders, vitamin deficiencies secondary to gastrointestinal malabsorption, rheumatologic, and hematologic disorders). On bone marrow biopsy she was found to have extensive deposits of cystine crystals, which was thought to be the cause of her myelosuppression leading to her pancytopenia. As a result, by treating her underlying cystinosis more aggressively we were able to observe an improvement in her pancytopenia a few months afterwards. Pancytopenia secondary to myelosuppression from cystine crystal deposition in the bone marrow is a very rare complication that has been reported in only a handful of case reports. This case illustrates the importance of keeping a broad differential diagnosis and systematically ruling out common causes of pancytopenia. It also demonstrates the importance of bone marrow biopsies in the evaluation of unexplained pancytopenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,430,915
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,257
of 3,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,005
of 272,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#31
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.