↓ Skip to main content

Low status rejection: How status hierarchies influence negative tie formation

Overview of attention for article published in Social Networks, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low status rejection: How status hierarchies influence negative tie formation
Published in
Social Networks, January 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.08.005
Authors

Brian Rubineau, Yisook Lim, Michael Neblo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 38%
Unspecified 6 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 24%
Psychology 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,648,268
of 13,578,256 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#90
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,749
of 263,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,578,256 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.