Title |
Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2015.2122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stefan Lüpold, John L. Fitzpatrick |
Abstract |
Postcopulatory sexual selection is widely accepted to underlie the extraordinary diversification of sperm morphology. However, why does it favour longer sperm in some taxa but shorter in others? Two recent hypotheses addressing this discrepancy offered contradictory explanations. Under the sperm dilution hypothesis, selection via sperm density in the female reproductive tract favours more but smaller sperm in large, but the reverse in small, species. Conversely, the metabolic constraint hypothesis maintains that ejaculates respond positively to selection in small endothermic animals with high metabolic rates, whereas low metabolic rates constrain their evolution in large species. Here, we resolve this debate by capitalizing on the substantial variation in mammalian body size and reproductive physiology. Evolutionary responses shifted from sperm length to number with increasing mammalian body size, thus supporting the sperm dilution hypothesis. Our findings demonstrate that body-size-mediated trade-offs between sperm size and number can explain the extreme diversification in sperm phenotypes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 27% |
United States | 4 | 18% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 36% |
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |