↓ Skip to main content

The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 3,828)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
484 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?
Published in
Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.), September 2018
DOI 10.1177/0956797618783714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica J. Boothby, Gus Cooney, Gillian M. Sandstrom, Margaret S. Clark

Abstract

Having conversations with new people is an important and rewarding part of social life. Yet conversations can also be intimidating and anxiety provoking, and this makes people wonder and worry about what their conversation partners really think of them. Are people accurate in their estimates? We found that following interactions, people systematically underestimated how much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company, an illusion we call the liking gap. We observed the liking gap as strangers got acquainted in the laboratory, as first-year college students got to know their dorm mates, and as formerly unacquainted members of the general public got to know each other during a personal development workshop. The liking gap persisted in conversations of varying lengths and even lasted for several months, as college dorm mates developed new relationships. Our studies suggest that after people have conversations, they are liked more than they know.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 484 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 38%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 31 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 910. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,701
of 16,651,243 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#22
of 3,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256
of 279,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science (Sage Publications Inc.)
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.