↓ Skip to main content

ORegAnno 3.0: a community-driven resource for curated regulatory annotation

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ORegAnno 3.0: a community-driven resource for curated regulatory annotation
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkv1203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Lesurf, Kelsy C. Cotto, Grace Wang, Malachi Griffith, Katayoon Kasaian, Steven J. M. Jones, Stephen B. Montgomery, Obi L. Griffith, The Open Regulatory Annotation Consortium

Abstract

The Open Regulatory Annotation database (ORegAnno) is a resource for curated regulatory annotation. It contains information about regulatory regions, transcription factor binding sites, RNA binding sites, regulatory variants, haplotypes, and other regulatory elements. ORegAnno differentiates itself from other regulatory resources by facilitating crowd-sourced interpretation and annotation of regulatory observations from the literature and highly curated resources. It contains a comprehensive annotation scheme that aims to describe both the elements and outcomes of regulatory events. Moreover, ORegAnno assembles these disparate data sources and annotations into a single, high quality catalogue of curated regulatory information. The current release is an update of the database previously featured in the NAR Database Issue, and now contains 1 948 307 records, across 18 species, with a combined coverage of 334 215 080 bp. Complete records, annotation, and other associated data are available for browsing and download at http://www.oreganno.org/.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 34%
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#971,121
of 10,616,067 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#1,253
of 17,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,889
of 306,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#104
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,616,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.