You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ORegAnno 3.0: a community-driven resource for curated regulatory annotation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nar/gkv1203 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Lesurf, Kelsy C. Cotto, Grace Wang, Malachi Griffith, Katayoon Kasaian, Steven J. M. Jones, Stephen B. Montgomery, Obi L. Griffith |
| Abstract |
The Open Regulatory Annotation database (ORegAnno) is a resource for curated regulatory annotation. It contains information about regulatory regions, transcription factor binding sites, RNA binding sites, regulatory variants, haplotypes, and other regulatory elements. ORegAnno differentiates itself from other regulatory resources by facilitating crowd-sourced interpretation and annotation of regulatory observations from the literature and highly curated resources. It contains a comprehensive annotation scheme that aims to describe both the elements and outcomes of regulatory events. Moreover, ORegAnno assembles these disparate data sources and annotations into a single, high quality catalogue of curated regulatory information. The current release is an update of the database previously featured in the NAR Database Issue, and now contains 1 948 307 records, across 18 species, with a combined coverage of 334 215 080 bp. Complete records, annotation, and other associated data are available for browsing and download at http://www.oreganno.org/. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 50% |
| Belgium | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 24% |
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,103,023
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#4,100
of 27,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,750
of 398,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#97
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.