↓ Skip to main content

Targeting Mitochondrial Function to Treat Quiescent Tumor Cells in Solid Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting Mitochondrial Function to Treat Quiescent Tumor Cells in Solid Tumors
Published in
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, November 2015
DOI 10.3390/ijms161126020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaonan Zhang, Angelo de Milito, Maria Hägg Olofsson, Joachim Gullbo, Padraig D’Arcy, Stig Linder

Abstract

The disorganized nature of tumor vasculature results in the generation of microenvironments characterized by nutrient starvation, hypoxia and accumulation of acidic metabolites. Tumor cell populations in such areas are often slowly proliferating and thus refractory to chemotherapeutical drugs that are dependent on an active cell cycle. There is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic interventions that circumvent growth dependency. The screening of drug libraries using multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) or glucose-starved tumor cells has led to the identification of several compounds with promising therapeutic potential and that display activity on quiescent tumor cells. Interestingly, a common theme of these drug screens is the recurrent identification of agents that affect mitochondrial function. Such data suggest that, contrary to the classical Warburg view, tumor cells in nutritionally-compromised microenvironments are dependent on mitochondrial function for energy metabolism and survival. These findings suggest that mitochondria may represent an "Achilles heel" for the survival of slowly-proliferating tumor cells and suggest strategies for the development of therapy to target these cell populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 29%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#29,873
of 44,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,585
of 292,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#197
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.