↓ Skip to main content

Preventive Effect of Preoperative Vitamin D Supplementation on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventive Effect of Preoperative Vitamin D Supplementation on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2018
DOI 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Levent Cerit, Barçın Özcem, Zeynep Cerit, Hamza Duygu

Abstract

To assess the relationship between preoperative vitamin D (vitD) supplementation and the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). The study group consisted of 328 consecutive patients. The ınfluence of preoperative vitD supplementation on POAF was reviewed in 136 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with vitD insufficiency (n=80) and vitD deficiency (n=56). Patients were assigned to receive either oral vitD (50.000 U) (treatment group, n=68) or not (control group, n=68) 48 hours before surgery. Patients were followed up during hospitalisation process with respect to POAF. There was no significant difference between treatment and control groups with regards to age, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left atrial diameter, and biochemical parameters. Also, there was no significant difference between these groups with regards to mean vitD level on both insufficiency and deficiency patients (24.6±3.7 vs. 24.9±3.9 ng/ml P=0.837, 11.4±4.9 vs. 10.9±5.2 ng/ml P=0.681, respectively). Although the occurrence of POAF was not significantly different among treatment and control groups in patients with vitD insufficiency (31% vs. 33% P=0.538), there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding to POAF in patients with vitD deficiency (18% vs. 29% P=0.02). Although preoperative vitD supplementation was not found to be associated with prevention of POAF in patients with vitD insufficiency, it was found to be strongly associated with prevention of POAF in those with vitD deficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Lecturer 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 42 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 43 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#282
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389,382
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.