↓ Skip to main content

Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 101)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: A Literature Review
Published in
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2018
DOI 10.1589/rika.33.669
Authors

Shuhei FUJIMOTO, Kanako KOMUKAI, Sho SUGITA, Motohide KOBAYASHI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,119,001
of 13,527,331 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#2
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,497
of 265,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,527,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them