↓ Skip to main content

Non-coding RNAs in Complex Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Aberrant Epigenetic Modifications of Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Aberrant Epigenetic Modifications of Non-coding RNAs in Human Disease
Chapter number 7
Book title
Non-coding RNAs in Complex Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0719-5_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130718-8, 978-9-81-130719-5
Authors

Yun Xiao, Jinyuan Xu, Wenkang Yin, Xiao, Yun, Xu, Jinyuan, Yin, Wenkang

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs, especially lncRNAs, have emerged as key components in histone modification. The alterations in the epigenetic modifications of lncRNAs underlie some human disorders ranging from neurodegeneration to cancer. To characterize the epigenetic modifications of lncRNAs, we first constructed the histone modification maps of various epigenetic markers across different cell lines. Then, we developed a method to identify epigenetically regulated lncRNAs and their response genes by integrating large scale epigenetic and transcriptional profiles. Our results showed that epigenetic alterations at the promoters of lncRNAs can influence their expression and the negative response genes of most epigenetically regulated lncRNAs were enriched for PRC2-binding genes. At last, we inferred some lncRNAs with aberrant epigenetic modifications in glioblastoma and Alzheimer's disease, and proved that theses lncRNAs may contribute to the initiation of human diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,116,796
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#511
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,898
of 336,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.