↓ Skip to main content

Genetic analyses reveal cryptic introgression in secretive marsh bird populations

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Evolution, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic analyses reveal cryptic introgression in secretive marsh bird populations
Published in
Ecology and Evolution, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/ece3.4472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie S. Coster, Amy B. Welsh, Gary Costanzo, Sergio R. Harding, James T. Anderson, Susan B. McRae, Todd E. Katzner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 38%
Environmental Science 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,701,933
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#1,546
of 8,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,398
of 345,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#37
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.