You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opioid therapy for treating rheumatoid arthritis pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003113.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel L Whittle, Bethan L Richards, Elaine Husni, Rachelle Buchbinder |
| Abstract |
Despite improvements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), pain control is often inadequate even when inflammation is well controlled. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,689,261
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,597
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,186
of 155,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.