↓ Skip to main content

Distribution and Habitat Use of King Rails in the Illinois and Upper Mississippi River Valleys

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution and Habitat Use of King Rails in the Illinois and Upper Mississippi River Valleys
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2009
DOI 10.2193/2008-561
Authors

Abigail J. Darrah, David G. Krementz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 7 13%
Unspecified 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 70%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Unspecified 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#11,083,167
of 12,465,035 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,230
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,513
of 338,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,465,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.