You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacto orçamentário do parto vaginal espontâneo e da cesariana eletiva sem indicação clínica no Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.26633/rpsp.2018.116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aline Piovezan Entringer, Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes Gomes, Ana Carolina Carioca da Costa, Márcia Pinto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 84% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 32 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,448,194
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#213
of 1,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,842
of 451,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#18
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.