↓ Skip to main content

End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring may be associated with a higher possibility of return of spontaneous circulation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring may be associated with a higher possibility of return of spontaneous circulation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based study
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13049-015-0187-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiun-Jia Chen, Yi-Kung Lee, Sheng-Wen Hou, Ming-Yuan Huang, Chen-Yang Hsu, Yung-Cheng Su

Abstract

During cardiac arrest, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring is recommended as a chest compression performance indicator. However, its frequency of use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and its benefits have never been evaluated in real clinical situations. We investigated OHCA patients in Taiwan to evaluate the frequency of ETCO2 monitoring and its effects on sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We sampled the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database, which contains 1 million beneficiaries. All adult beneficiaries older than 18 years who presented with OHCA and received chest compression between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2012 were enrolled. We further identified patients with ETCO2 monitoring and matched each 1 with 20 patients who did not receive ETCO2 monitoring based on their propensity scores. A simple conditional logistic regression model was applied to compare the odds ratio (OR) for sustained ROSC in the matched cohorts. A total of 5041 OHCA patients were enrolled. The frequency of ETCO2 monitoring has increased since 2010 but still is low. After matching, 53 patients with ETCO2 monitoring and 1060 without ETCO2 monitoring were selected. The OR of sustained ROSC in the ETCO2 group was significantly increased (2.38, 95 % CI 1.28-4.42). Patients who received ETCO2 monitoring during OHCA had a higher possibility of sustained ROSC, but the overall use of ETCO2 monitoring is still low despite strong recommendations for its use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,915,304
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#505
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,778
of 386,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.