↓ Skip to main content

Curating the innate immunity interactome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Curating the innate immunity interactome
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-4-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Lynn, Calvin Chan, Misbah Naseer, Melissa Yau, Raymond Lo, Anastasia Sribnaia, Giselle Ring, Jaimmie Que, Kathleen Wee, Geoffrey L Winsor, Matthew R Laird, Karin Breuer, Amir K Foroushani, Fiona SL Brinkman, Robert EW Hancock

Abstract

The innate immune response is the first line of defence against invading pathogens and is regulated by complex signalling and transcriptional networks. Systems biology approaches promise to shed new light on the regulation of innate immunity through the analysis and modelling of these networks. A key initial step in this process is the contextual cataloguing of the components of this system and the molecular interactions that comprise these networks. InnateDB (http://www.innatedb.com) is a molecular interaction and pathway database developed to facilitate systems-level analyses of innate immunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 4 3%
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 115 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 7%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,660,832
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#511
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,084
of 94,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.