↓ Skip to main content

Implications of afforestation for bird communities: the importance of preceding land-use type

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of afforestation for bird communities: the importance of preceding land-use type
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0987-4
Authors

Conor T. Graham, Mark W. Wilson, Tom Gittings, Thomas C. Kelly, Sandra Irwin, John L. Quinn, John O’Halloran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,470,393
of 12,340,632 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#787
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,844
of 323,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.