↓ Skip to main content

Amphibian chytridiomycosis: a review with focus on fungus-host interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
493 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amphibian chytridiomycosis: a review with focus on fungus-host interactions
Published in
Veterinary Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13567-015-0266-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascale Van Rooij, An Martel, Freddy Haesebrouck, Frank Pasmans

Abstract

Amphibian declines and extinctions are emblematic for the current sixth mass extinction event. Infectious drivers of these declines include the recently emerged fungal pathogens Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Chytridiomycota). The skin disease caused by these fungi is named chytridiomycosis and affects the vital function of amphibian skin. Not all amphibians respond equally to infection and host responses might range from resistant, over tolerant to susceptible. The clinical outcome of infection is highly dependent on the amphibian host, the fungal virulence and environmental determinants. B. dendrobatidis infects the skin of a large range of anurans, urodeles and caecilians, whereas to date the host range of B. salamandrivorans seems limited to urodeles. So far, the epidemic of B. dendrobatidis is mainly limited to Australian, neotropical, South European and West American amphibians, while for B. salamandrivorans it is limited to European salamanders. Other striking differences between both fungi include gross pathology and thermal preferences. With this review we aim to provide the reader with a state-of-the art of host-pathogen interactions for both fungi, in which new data pertaining to the interaction of B. dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans with the host's skin are integrated. Furthermore, we pinpoint areas in which more detailed studies are necessary or which have not received the attention they merit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 487 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 118 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 16%
Student > Master 68 14%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 114 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 15%
Environmental Science 46 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 35 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 2%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 126 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#508,635
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#6
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,243
of 393,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.