↓ Skip to main content

Estado nutricional e distribuição de gordura corporal em crianças e adolescentes com Fibrose Cística

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estado nutricional e distribuição de gordura corporal em crianças e adolescentes com Fibrose Cística
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, November 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320152011.03242015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Célia Regina Moutinho de Miranda Chaves, Ana Lúcia Pereira da Cunha, Ana Carolina da Costa, Roseli de Souza Santos da Costa, Speranza Vieira Lacerda

Abstract

assessing the nutritional status and body fat distribution in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Fifty-six (56) 8-18 year old patients were assessed for fat distribution by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, for nutritional status by height/age, and for body mass index to age and dietary intake by 24-hour dietary recall. Approximately 50% of the sample showed adequate nutritional status. Most of it showed inadequate caloric and lipid intake. BMI/age was the nutritional indicator that best showed the increased percentage of trunk fat, android/gynecoidratio and trunk fat/total fat ratio. Patients with Pancreatic Insufficiency and eutrophic individuals showed higher median android/gynecoidratio. Increased abdominal adiposity was evidenced by DXA. The BMI did not identify decreased lean body mass. However, when body mass was high, it was significant for abdominal adiposity. The anthropometric assessment of patients with cystic fibrosis should be associated with body composition and body fat distribution to obtain an earlier malnutrition and cardiometabolic risk factor diagnosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#9,625,045
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#370
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,232
of 345,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.