↓ Skip to main content

Self-check with plaque disclosing solution improves oral hygiene in schoolchildren living in a children’s home

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-check with plaque disclosing solution improves oral hygiene in schoolchildren living in a children’s home
Published in
Archives of Public Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13690-018-0296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukiko Nagashima, Hideo Shigeishi, Eri Fukada, Hideaki Amano, Masahiro Urade, Masaru Sugiyama

Abstract

The effectiveness of an oral hygiene program for children living in a children's home has been reported. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the possible effects of self-checking of oral health among children residing in a children's home. The objective of this study was to examine if self-checking using plaque disclosing solution improves oral hygiene in schoolchildren living in a children's home. We enrolled nine schoolchildren (six girls) without untreated decayed teeth living in a children's home in Japan. This preliminary study was designed as a 5-month program comprising group and individual instructions and self-checking using plaque disclosing solution. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis to evaluate the change of Plaque Control Record (PCR) and Patient Hygiene Performance (PHP). The mean PCR significantly decreased to 38.7% after 3 months of self-checking using disclosing solution compared with that before self-checking (i.e., at 1 month) (60.7%) (P < 0.01). PHP score significantly decreased to 1.4 at 4 months compared with that at baseline (2.8) and at 1 month (2.7) (P = 0.012 and P = 0.018). Improvement of oral hygiene status was evaluated according to the ratio of PCR at 4 months to that at 1 month. The average improvement ratio was 0.4 ± 0.35 (range: 0.0-1.0). Significant correlation was not found between improvement rate and school grade (r = 0.63, P = 0.070). Our results suggest that self-checking with disclosing solution may be effective in improving oral hygiene among schoolchildren at a children's home.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 18 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Engineering 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,314,812
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#265
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,724
of 347,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.