↓ Skip to main content

Neurological features of 14q24-q32 interstitial deletion: report of a new case

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 417)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurological features of 14q24-q32 interstitial deletion: report of a new case
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13039-015-0196-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Nicita, Marilena Di Giacomo, Orazio Palumbo, Emanuela Ferri, Daniela Maiorani, Federico Vigevano, Massimo Carella, Alessandro Capuano

Abstract

Interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 14 involving the 14q24-q32 region have been reported in less than 20 patients. Previous studies mainly attempted to delineate recognizable facial dysmorphisms; conversely, descriptions on neurological features are limited to the presence of cognitive and motor delay, but no better characterization exists. In this paper we report on a patient with a de novo interstitial deletion of 5.5 Mb at 14q24.3-q31.1. The deletion encompasses 84 genes, including fourteen Mendelian genes. He presented with dysmorphic face, developmental delay, paroxysmal non-epileptic events and, subsequently, epilepsy. The clinical and molecular evaluation of this patient and the review of the literature expand the phenotype of 14q23-q32 deletion syndrome to include paroxysmal non-epileptic events and infantile-onset focal seizures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Neuroscience 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,184,920
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#44
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,184
of 398,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.