↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the middle cerebral artery

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility of Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the middle cerebral artery
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12947-018-0133-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Kaczynski, Rachel Home, Karen Shields, Matthew Walters, William Whiteley, Joanna Wardlaw, David E. Newby

Abstract

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound remains the only imaging modality that is capable of real-time measurements of blood flow velocity and microembolic signals in the cerebral circulation. We here assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in healthy volunteers and patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Between March and August 2017, we recruited 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. In a quiet temperature-controlled room, two 1-h transcranial Doppler measurements of blood flow velocities and microembolic signals were performed sequentially on the same day (within-day repeatability) and a third 7-14 days later (between-day reproducibility). Levels of agreement were assessed by interclass correlation co-efficient. In healthy volunteers (31±9 years, 11 male), within-day repeatability of Doppler measurements were 0.880 (95% CI 0.726-0.950) for peak velocity, 0.867 (95% CI 0.700-0.945) for mean velocity, and 0.887 (95% CI 0.741-0.953) for end-diastolic velocity. Between-day reproducibility was similar but lower: 0.777 (95% CI 0.526-0.905), 0.795 (95% CI 0.558-0.913), and 0.674 (95% CI 0.349-0.856) respectively. In patients (72±11 years, 11 male), within-day repeatability of Doppler measurements were higher: 0.926 (95% CI 0.826-0.970) for peak velocity, 0.922 (95% CI 0.817-0.968) for mean velocity, and 0.868 (95% CI 0.701-0.945) for end-diastolic velocity. Similarly, between-day reproducibility revealed lower values: 0.800 (95% CI 0.567-0.915), 0.786 (95% CI 0.542-0.909), and 0.778 (95% CI 0.527-0.905) respectively. In both cohorts, the intra-observer Bland Altman analysis demonstrated acceptable mean measurement differences and limits of agreement between series of middle cerebral artery velocity measurements with very few outliers. In patients, the carotid stenoses were 30-40% (n = 9), 40-50% (n = 6), 50-70% (n = 3) and > 70% (n = 2). No spontaneous embolisation was detected in either of the groups. Transcranial Doppler generates reproducible data regarding the middle cerebral artery velocities. However, larger studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability. ClinicalTrial.gov (ID NCT 03050567), retrospectively registered on 15/05/2017.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Engineering 4 9%
Mathematics 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,327,663
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#78
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,375
of 337,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.