↓ Skip to main content

Combined use of hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced cervix carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined use of hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced cervix carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006377.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludy Lutgens, Jacoba van der Zee, Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Danielle FM De Haas-Kock, Jeroen Buijsen, Ghislaine APG van Mastrigt, Guido Lammering, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 42%
Engineering 14 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 9 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#10,023,988
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,291
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,257
of 345,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.