↓ Skip to main content

Anxiolytics for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anxiolytics for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002849
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R Hughes, Lindsay F Stead, Tim Lancaster

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Psychology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,753,939
of 26,488,660 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,013
of 13,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,871
of 41,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,488,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.